The law that I mast agree with is Reed`s Law.
The reason that I think this law best fits is his use of affiliation. He
compares social media to his law to show us proof. Social media networks that
rise to fame is usually connected to the large number of followers the network
has. Many of these different networks have maintenance teams working 24/7 to
make sure that the network is running correctly and also a team working to
improve the usability of it. The law is also best fit in my opinion because
many groups on social media networks advertise other networks or groups and
gain attention to their cause. This shows that affiliation to a social media site or any other network is the key to
success. Having more people on a network can lead to more diversity
and different perspectives which ultimately leads to better feedback on
ways to make the website better and continue the success of it. Five years from
now I feel like we will receive information similar to the way we do today. Of
course there will be technological advances bit how far can it grow? The speed
that we receive information on networks will increase over the next five years,
and the devices in which we receive this information will also continue to
improve. There is always a better way to do something and people figure these
ways out. The most drastic change I could see in the future is people
using less hand held devices. Google is already working on a new device called google glasses. These glasses allow one to take pictures, make calls, and other functions hand held devices provide. That's the goal that many companies are trying to
reach now. The easier the better in the producers eye.
Wednesday, February 24, 2016
Thursday, February 11, 2016
"Online Identity"
The article about
online identity really improved my perception on the subject and how it affects
everyone. Now days many employers do research on the people they are looking to
hire via social media. Social media gives users the advantage. One can post
about anything and create the public image they long for. People often abuse
their right on social media by creating something they’re not. The article stated
that before modern equipment used to uncover false profiles came about many
people could hide their true identity to trick other internet users. Many
social media websites have filters now that can sort through profiles and
decide whether the person is “dogging” the system or not. With these advancing
technologies to uncover fraud take place one is left to create an authentic
profile or risk the threat of profile termination. In my opinion, I think
authenticity is more important than anonymity when creating online profiles.
Facebook imposed a 1 billion dollar photo-sharing service with Instagram to strengthen the process. This
allows for connectivity between the two social media websites and a
strengthened process of uncovering falsified profiles. With this being said, users
are forced to use real names that are connected through emails to create
profiles. It also helps put an end to “creepers” that create fake profiles and
go under the radar and the unknown true of the credibility of profiles. I do think that advertisements targeting certain people through profile ingredients gets creepy. But users have to take the good, along with the bad.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)